|Leanna Read||Alan Spencer||Dorothy Francis||Penny Maclennan|
|Miranda Ip||Narelle Hore||Melvyn Davis||Paul Woods|
|Ross Smith||Patrick Ball||Kris Hume||Karen Kingham|
|Helen Pickering||Andrew Thomson||Bob MacMahon||Elizabeth Morrell|
|Tony Donaghy||Mark Sutherland||Cathy Vlouhas||Nicola Riley|
|Sally McCray||Neil Cunningham||Cathie Richards||Peter Wilson|
|Winsome Abbott||Michael Barnett||Jane Luddington||Marcelle Middleton|
|Sabita Rajeshwar||Tom Hartley||Liliana Sputore||Maria Townsend|
|Ibolya Nyulasi||Christine Kiddell||Kerry Forbes||David Russell|
Roger White, Darrell Crawford, Kevin Williams
Proposed to be accepted by Paul Woods, Seconded by Michael Barnett
There were no comments.
This year has been a very active and important year for AuSPEN. We have targetted the priorities established by the Strategic Planning Committee Meeting late in 1997. In an effort to enhance the exposure of the Society we have developed promotional material and through this joint Scientific Meeting with the Gastroenterological Society of Australia we have tried to increase exposure to the specific target groups of physicians, surgeons and nurses.
Four specific task groups or committees have been established. These are the Strategic Planning Committee, Scientific Program Committee, Professional Development Committee and the Research and Clinical Advisory Committee.
I believe that the future survival of this Society depends on the development of important strategic alliances. These alliances need to be based at a local, State basis as well as at national and international levels. The development of a solid base membership is essential. Looking to formalize alliances with New Zealand and possibly with the Asian Society (PENSA) I believe should be considered. AuSPEN has been an active vocal member of the International Confederation of Nutrition Support Organizations. This international collaboration I believe provides exciting opportunities for AuSPEN Members. The preparation of educational material by way of a structured nutrition support curriculum and a mechanism for accreditation is a major step forward for AuSPEN. Access to this information will be avaliable to AuSPEN Members as part of their subscription.
I wish to personally thank the Members of Council for their support and hard work over the year. I would like to send the Society's best wishes to Margaret Allman, (AuSPEN Secretary) and new baby Thomas. I would like to thank Sabita Rajeshwar and the members of the local Organising Committee for all the hard work that was required to achieve this excellent Conference. I would also like to acknowledge the support of the Industry who are critical to the viability of the Society.
This was presented by Paul Woods as Kevin Williams, the Treasurer, was an apology. Paul highlighted the problem of our foreign exchange exposure, which made the Society vulnerable through the Journal expenses. A vote of thanks was extended to Kevin Williams for his outstanding work as Treasurer of AuSPEN. David Russell moved that the Treasurer's Report be accepted, seconded by Tom Hartley.
The following new Members already had been admitted to the Society since the last AGM.
|Patrick Ball, 7/98, NZ||Michael Barnett, 10/97, UK||Judy Robbins, 12/97, VIC|
|Dianne Chaseling, 2/98, QLD||Tania Engeman, 7/98, QLD||Helen Shelley, 7/98, VIC|
|Jane Gabb, 7/98, NSW||Kerryn Gamble, 5/98, VIC||Timothy Spencer, 7/98, NSW|
|Vanessa Giannikas, 5/98, NSW||Patricia Gleeson, 11/97, QLD||Karen Storer, 8/98, NSW|
|Anne Gleeson, 12/97, VIC||Eleanor Gregson, 12/97, VIC||Anne-Marie Wilson, 10/98, VIC|
|Joerg Griesel, 2/98, NSW||John Hall, 11/97, WA||Deminia Yaacoub, 2/98, NSW|
|Ralph Heine, 7/98, VIC||Clare Jennings, 7/98, VIC||Kylie Shanahan, 10/98, VIC|
|Deborah Jessen, 10/98, VIC||Zhu Ming Jiang, 7/98, China||Sheena Singh, 8/98, NSW|
|Sujata Joshi, 7/98, VIC||Linda Kar, 2/98, VIC||Helen Still, 10/97, QLD|
|Karen Kingham, 5/98, NSW||Sonya Mattiazzi, 7/98, QLD||Justine Turner, 10/97, WA|
|Paola Parkins, 5/98, VIC||Amanda Proctor, 7/98, VIC||Amanda Wray, 5/98, SA|
|Min Zhang, 11/97, SA||-||-|
Proposed by Ross Smith, Seconded by Mal Davis.
Retiring Members of Council included Kevin Williams, who was Treasurer of AuSPEN for a number of years. His dedication and excellent systematic way of organising AuSPEN's Accounts were duly recognised.
Leanna Read also retired after being on Council for 6 years. She has made a significant contribution to the scientific endeavours of AuSPEN.
The following Members have nominated successfully for Council : Elizabeth Morrell, Maria Makrides and Liliana Sputore. Their nominations were proposed by Bob MacMahon and Seconded by Tom Hartley.
Office Bearers of the Society for 1999 will be :
President - Julie Bines, who agreed to continue her Presidency. Secretary - Liliana Sputore President Elect - Paul Woods Treasurer - Sabita Rajeshwar
It is a different concept that AuSPEN has explored in terms of sharing and running the meeting in parallel with the Gastroenterology Society of Australia. There were significant positives with this process with Elaine Siggins from the Australian Gastroenterology Society who organised both conferences simultaneously. This has had a positive effect and certainly financially we look forward to a profit from this meeting.
Trade support has also been excellent creating a synergy between the two Societies. We look forward to some feedback from both the Conference Organising Committee and from the Members as to whether the Society should pursue such a process in the future.
The Convenor of the 1999 meeting will be Alan Spencer. The meeting is anticipated to be in September and possibly on the Gold Coast. Professor Jeejeebhoy has been proposed as the invited overseas speaker.
A vote of thanks was moved by Julie Bines on behalf of the Society to the Organising Committee of the 1998 Meeting, which included Sabita Rajeshwar, Margaret Allman, Marcelle Middleton, Karen Stoner and Kevin Steven.
Julie Bines moved a vote of thanks be extended to the Sustaining Associates, Seconded by Paul Woods.
No reports from the Strategic Planning Group, the Scientific Programme Committee, the Research and Clinical Advisory Committee or the Professional Development Committee.
Julie Bines reported on developments with the Federation of Australian Nutrition Societies. In her report she outlined the proposed structure of this group and it was decided that AuSPEN should take a cautious approach in pursuing involvement.
The International Confederation of Nutrition Support Organisations is comprised of recognised nutrition support organisations from around the World. Julie Bines reported on their proposals. This group has met overseas in Nice and had discussions regarding developing a Web based discipline specific nutrition support curriculum. AuSPEN would be both interested and actively participating in such developments so that we can disseminate educational material to our Members. Julie Bines will continue to serve and represent AuSPEN at these Committees.
This Motion was put to the AGM by Kevin Williams :
That the Council of AuSPEN investigates the mechanism by which New Zealand can become part of the Society as a region rather than by individual Membership and that this proposal be brought back to the Society as a motion at a subsequent meeting.
Julie Bines spoke to the motion that we need to extend the Society's Membership and perhaps New Zealand could be a source of new Members. AuSPEN already has a significant number of N.Z. Members. Such a move may require changing the name of the Society. It was proposed by Paul Woods that this should be explored and that the Society's name be changed to encompass New Zealand, Seconded by Dorothy Francis.
The item of a permanent secretariat for the Society was raised and this will be finalised by the end of the year.
Kevin Williams proposed the introduction of Student Membership. It was moved that Student Membership dues be set at $75 per annum for students who are able to verify their student status. Supported by David Russell, Seconded by Bob MacMahon.
The meeting closed at 5.30pm.
|Sabita Rajeshwar||Elisabeth Morrell||Stephanie Morrison||Paul Woods|
|Helen Pickering||Winsome Abbott||Penny Hillsman||Julie Bines|
|Narelle Hore||Wendy Davidson||Alan Spencer||Linda Kar|
|David Russell||Joy Blacka||Ibolya Nyulasi||Indi Richardson|
|Andrew Thomson||Melwyn Davis||Andrew Davies||Patrick Ball|
|Joanne Davis||Ralf Hein||Kathryn Marshall||Liliana Sputore|
|Kerry Forbes||Ross Smith||-||-|
Kevin Williams, Maria Makrides, Michael Barnett, David Forbes and Roger White.
These were proposed. Accepted by S. Rajeshwar and seconded by D. Russell.
Last year at the AGM we presented a number of priorities to achieve in 1999. I am pleased to say that many of these aims have been successfully achieved.
(1) We now have a functioning Secretariat. This will be important in maintaining continuity as a communication hub for the Society. Through the Secretariat a membership database has been developed. This will greatly improve interaction between the Society and its membership. This has been facilitated by lbolya and I am very grateful for her efforts in establishing the permanent Secretariat.
(2) The Micronutrient Guidelines have been officially launched. This document will fill an important gap in current parenteral nutrition practice in Australia. I thank David Russell for taking on the task of completing this document with the assistance of Michael Bamett and Alan Shenkin.
(3) AuSPEN has been at the forefront of the educational initiatives being developed by the ICNSO. Through this involvement we hope to have a web-based education program available to members of AuSPEN very soon.
(4)Locally AuSPEN has played a leadership role in minimising the clinical impact of the current intravenous multivitamin shortage.
Through the past year AuSPEN has been trying to reach out to other professionals in other disciplines who are interested in nutrition. While these achievements are certainly something we can all be proud of, there are still important challenges that the Society must address.
AuSPEN must continue to work hard at establishing and maintaining strategic alliances within different disease orientated societies. We need to work with Industry to bring to our patients some of the recent advancements in clinical nutrition by way of new products and treatment protocols.
I am very honoured to have been President of AuSPEN for the last 3 years.
I would like to thank
I wish Paul and the Executive all the best as they bring AuSPEN into the new millennium
Profit & Loss Comparison
1/1/98 through to 31/12/99 (in Aus Dollars)
|Conference '98 - Other||13950.00||0.00|
Total Conference '98
|Income - Other||0.00||13210.00|
|Total Conference '98||5700.00||0.00|
|Total Council Meeting||694.75||1587.00|
|Fees & Charges:||-||-|
|Fees & Charges - Other||0.00||0.08|
|Total Fees & Charges||2093.40||580.97|
|Travel - Other||0.00||18.50|
This was accepted by I. Nyulasi and seconded by H. Pickering.
Two requests have been presented to council this year, both of which have been successful: L. Kar and K. Forbes.
The current total number of financial members of the Society is 237. The following new members have been accepted by the Society since last AGM:
|Nicole Tepana||Dr. Geoffrey Forbes|
|Alison Hannam||Martell Davidson|
|Dr. Kilminster||Dr. NG|
|Gemma McLeod||Ruth de Souza|
|Mrs. Ward||Christine Walsh|
|Sandra Cork||Dr. David Moore|
|Melinda White||Joy Blacka|
|Joanne Clark||Jodie Bennett|
|Roy Dennis||Brigitte Coloran|
|Scott Parkes||Andrew Davies|
|Anne Marie Wilson||Jacqueline Bailey|
|Maryanne Chapmen||Kylie Shanahan|
Andrew Thomson, Andrew Davies and Alan Spencer.
This was accepted by P. Woods and seconded by I. Nyulasi.
D. Crawford, after approximately 7 years on Council.
S. Rajeshwar, after a year of serving as treasurer, as agreed when she took this role on and after a busy year of organising the 1998 Canberra Society Scientific meeting.
J. Bines proposed a vote of thanks for their significant contribution to the Society.
J. Bines is also retiring from the role of President of the Society after 3 years. She has also served as Council Member for various years previous to this. She has however agreed to stay on Council. Her contribution to the Society has been outstanding through the years.
Council has extended a vote of thanks to Julie for her role as President.
Rest of Council:
Julie Bines moved a vote of thanks on behalf of the Society, to be extended to the Conference Organising committee, with A. Spencer as convenor, D. Crawford with his major involvement with the scientific program and Charles Fleetwood as conference organiser.
A vote of thanks was also moved to the Sustaining Associates by J. Bines and seconded by P. Woods. These are:
Gold sponsors: Baxter and Novartis
Silver sponsors: Abbott and Nutritia
Bronze sponsors: Mead Jhonson and Tyco HealthCare.
Frezenius was thanked for sponsoring Dr. McFie.
Nutrition Consultants was also a sponsor.
The inclusion of the Nutrition Journal as part of the membership fee of AuSPEN has become a difficult issue for the last 12 months.
The increase in cost of the Journal, particularly due to currency exchange has created funding problems to the extent of chronically running the Society at a loss. The current $100.00 membership fee is insufficient to cover for running costs, Newsletter, Journal, etc.
Fortunately, profit from last year’s scientific meeting has managed to cover for this deficit. Nevertheless it would be unwise for the Society to rely on this, as this income cannot be warranted on an ongoing basis.
Breakdown of costs:
Current cost of the Nutrition Journal $81.00/person/year
Production and mailing of newsletter $32.00/person/year
Society costs $30.00/person/year
Current membership fee $100.00/person/year
(Negative by $43.00 /person/year)
I. Nyulasi presented results of the questionnaires sent out to the general membership seeking their opinion on the Journal subscription as part of the membership fee. Results reported are as follow:
Questionnaires circulated: Approx. to 200 members
Responses received: 60, of which:
*80% believed that subscribing to Nutrition was an appropriate use of funds.
*60% did not prefer subscription to another journal.
P. Woods expressed concern re: keep running the Society at a loss. Options suggested:
*Increase fee to $150.00 (to cover cost)
*Keep fee at $100.00 and discontinue the inclusion of the Journal as part of the subscription fee.
(NB: The subscription to the journal cannot be made optional to members as bulk order makes the purchase of the journal cost effective).
A provisional motion was proposed by P. Woods with both of the above options.
The present membership felt that it was worth making further considerations before making a decision.
Comments made by present members:
Action: A small task group amongst council members will be formed who will approach this issue further with the trade during this scientific meeting. If the outcome is unsuccessful by the end of this meeting, the motion will be put forward to the membership and an extraordinary AGM to be held. Vote by proxy for those members unable to attend will be considered.
This will be a priority for this coming year. Electronic newsletter will be considered.
Little activity has occurred in this area for the past year.
The Web based education program is close to conclusion (Jan 2000).
There will be a year 2000 symposium in Brisbane, which could be an opportunity for involvement for the Society, but it is uncertain if the symposium will go ahead.
New Zeland issue.
New Zeland issue.
This discussion has followed last year’s idea to incorporate N.Z. as part of AuSPEN. This issue including the background, legality and implications were discussed and presented by P. Woods.
The Society has been accepting members from N.Z. and Asian countries. N.Z. has shown strong interest in becoming associated to AuSPEN and members have expressed and demonstrated support including increasing the membership numbers.
The current name of the Society does not include N.Z. members.
If the name of the Society takes place, then other corporate changes will occur as well.
Present members suggested that Council re-visits the concept and sells such concept in the actual place (eg. hold a scientific meeting in N.Z.)
M.Davis suggested that consideration should be given to ensure that the continuation of support from the industry is still warranted in such case.
P. Woods proposed a motion that a change of name is adopted to include the N.Z. membership.
Action: Distribute this motion amongst members and discuss this at an extraordinary AGM to come to a decision. Members unable to attend this meeting should have access to a vote by proxy.
Meeting closed at 5.55PM.
Next meeting: Friday 27/10/2000 at Lorne. Time to be advised in the Conference Program.
Here are the results of the feedback and evaluation forms filled out for the recent AuSPEN Conference held at the Gold Coast. Apart from a few concerns with the food, the response on the whole was very positive. I would like to take this oppotunity to thank Dr. Darrell Crawford and Mr. Charles Fleetwood for their invaluable help in organising this Conference. I wish the Victorian team the best for organising the 2000 Conference to be held in Lorne in October.
Number of forms returned = 32(Approximately 20% of delegates) Excellent Satisfactory Programme 1 2 3 4 Content 18 13 1 0 Quality of Presentation 21 12 1 1 Venue Facilities 22 10 0 0 Poster Layout 8 14 8 0 Trade layout 13 16 2 0 Catering 7 13 9 3
Better quality Free Papers needed (2) International speakers were excellent (2) Excellent program - one of the best conference been to in years (4) More presentations from Dietitians needed Venue was too cold Everything excellent Catering: Long queues Not enough for vegetarians Croissants - poor choice Excellent Satisfactory 1 2 3 Welcome breakfast 13 12 3 Conference dinner 12 13 2 Comments: Memorable conference dinner Tigers were great (6) More time for dinner Welcome breakfast was a good idea Food at dinner was average, but venue excellent Highlights: International speakers (10) Memorable dinner (5) Excellent program content (3) Venue (3) Tigers (4) Good size for networking, discussion etc Improvements: Timing for call of abstracts and registrations and events Better, more practical and longer workshops (6) Vegetarian food options (2) Conference proceedings ( should include all abstracts, in order with all Free Paper and Poster References) More information on name tags More free papers
This was awarded to Linda Kar, Carlos Scheinkestel, Ibolya Nyulasi and Michael Bailey for their paper entitled: "Comparison of Schofield Equation and Indirect Calorimetry in the Intensive Care Setting"
The Puritan-Bennett 7250 Metabolic Monitor uses indirect calorimetry to determine energy expenditure. Energy requirements are predicted using the Schofield equation, incorporating an estimate of the patient's weight and the clinician's judgement of an appropriate stress factor. This estimate has the potential to under or over estimate energy requirements. A retrospective audit was conducted to compare energy requirements predicted by the Schofield Equation with the energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry.
Forty intensive care patients (27 male, 13 female), mean age 51 years (range 18 - 81) were included. The Puritan-Bennett 7250 Metabolic Monitor was used at the bedside to measure energy expenditure continuously. Body weight was estimated for each patient. The basal metabolic rate was estimated using the Schofield Equation, multiplied by a stress factor to estimate energy requirements (mean stress factor = 1.5, range 1.2 - 2.0)
The ratio of estimated / measured energy expenditure was 0.93, indicating that the predictive equation underestimated energy expenditure on average by 7%. The use of the predictive equation and stress factor was significantly less accurate compared to measured values for patients with lower energy expenditure (p=0.03). This group of patients included respiratory failure and surgical patients for whom lower stress factors were used, and suggests that these less closely estimate actual energy needs than for the patient's given higher stress factors, including, multitrauma and burns.
Previous studies have examined particulate contamination (PC) in various parts of the parenteral nutrition (PN) system. This study measured PC in fluids which had been passed through all the associated tubing and equipment, as would have been received by the patient.
Two in One mixtures and separate lipid emulsion in syringes supplied to paediatric patients (N=20) were sampled at the bedside immediately prior to connection to the patient. Samples from the line were drawn into prepared containers, sealed and returned to the laboratory for investigation. The samples were filtered through a 0.8 um pore size gridded membrane (Millipore AAWG 047 00). The particles were viewed by light microscopy and sized using an eyepiece graticule (G10, BS3260). Counts were cross validated between operators. Background counts derived from control runs were subtracted. Results
Paediatric PN 2 in 1 N = 20 Size in microns >40 >25 >10 >5 <5 Particles / mL First 50mL MEAN 0.16 0.38 1.43 11.77 7.59 SD 0.23 0.26 1.09 7.38 2.56 Second 50mL MEAN 0.16 0.34 0.80 9.23 5.72 SD 0.17 0.21 0.40 3.74 2.67 Lipid Emul MEAN 0.57 0.92 1.85 9.98 18.5 5 mL SD 0.42 0.38 1.37 4.24 11.2
PC is an unwanted contaminant that is still present in significant amounts in paediatric PN solutions. If in-line filtration were not employed, these particles would have been infused into patients.
Dr Tom Hartley, Pathology Dept., Royal Hobart Hospital
One of the ongoing debates in nutritional support is "over" versus "under" prescription of nutritional formulae. This has provided the stimulus for this article - what is the physiological response to the provision of more nutrients than are required for metabolic balance and/or normal growth ?
The common practice is to match nutritional prescription of 'energy' to an estimate of the metabolic requirement of the individual. This implies that we have a good idea of what the metabolic rate of an individual is. But what is the metabolic rate ? Metabolic rate is the Kilojoules of energy put into
Mechanical work in an organism is technically 'too difficult' to measure as are most of the other the other energy 'sinks' in the energy balance. So between the 1880's and 1940's, when there was a lot of experimental work being in this area, they drew upon the Law of Conservation of Energy. To apply this a fairly sweeping assumption was made viz. the eventual fate of all tissues is that they are totally returned back to the environment as simple component molecules - carbon dioxide and water - with all the energy that went into their synthesis being liberated as heat energy. In effect this was equivalent to them being 'burnt'. Then the overall energy balance in humans could be equated to the aerobic combustion of the daily diet / nutritional support prescription.
Carbohydrate combustion eg Glucose = C6H1206
Fat combustion eg Tristearin = C57H110O6
The situation for proteins was and is not so straight forward. These molecules all contain nitrogen and some contain sulphur, hence the end products of combustion include nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide.
Protein combustion eg alpha Casein fragment = C43H64O10N12
Nevertheless this 'combustion model' was found to be applicable to human metabolism when measurements were made, over periods of 24 hours or more, of heat production by individuals living and working in a whole body calorimeter. The data for carbohydrates and fats were in excellent agreement, see Table 1, with the 'combustion model' but there was a discrepancy for protein. The reason for this is that human metabolism only takes nitrogen and sulphur down to urea and sulphate.
TABLE 1 : Energy Production in Kilojoules per Gram of Carbohydrate, Fat and Protein
|-||Bomb Calorimeter||Whole Body Calorimeter||Generally Accepted Conversion factors|
Practical Ways of Measuring the Metabolic Rate
Obviously the Whole Body Calorimeter was and still is an impractical way to measure metabolic rate in clinical situations. Fortunately in 1919 the empirical method of Harris and Benedict was published (A Biometric Study of Basal Metabolism in Man. Washington, Carnegie Institute, V 279, pp 40 - 44, 1919). This is an empirical expression for Heat Production in Man in Kilojoules :
For Men : 4.2 * [ 66.47 + 13.75 * Wt, kg + 5.003 * Ht, cms - 6.775 * Age ] = 279.2 + 57.75 * Wt + 21.01 * Ht - 28.46 * Age For Women : 4.2 * [ 655.1 + 9.563 * Wt, kg + 1.850 * Ht, cms - 4.676 Age, yrs ] = 2751 + 40.16 * Wt + 7.77 * Ht - 19.64 * Age
Other workers wanted to exploit the fact that oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production must also be related to metabolic rate. At this point the concept of Respiratory Quotient, RQ, was introduced because from the 'combustion model' chemical equations you can see that the different substrates produce different amounts of carbon dioxide. It was proposed that the predominating type of substrate being metabolised at any one time could be identified at any time just by measuring the ratio of carbon dioxide produced to the amount of oxygen consumed by an individual :
Theoretical All Carbohydrate metabolism : RQ = (6 * 22.4L CO2) / (6 * 22.4L O2) = 1.00 Theoretical All Fat metabolism : RQ = (114 * 22.4L CO2) / (163 * 22.4L O2) = 0.70 Theoretical All Protein metabolism : RQ = (43 * 22.4L CO2) / (63 * 22.4L O2) = 0.68
These theoretical RQ's were compared with measured and all agreed apart from that for protein. For reasons already mentioned the end products of protein metabolism in humans do not include nitrogen dioxide or sulphur dioxide. These molecules contain some of the oxygen used in the combustion, hence less oxygen ends up in carbon dioxide, so the theoretical RQ gets lowered. In aerobic metabolism more oxygen molecules end up in carbon dioxide molecules hence raising the RQ observed for protein. The experimental results were as shown in Table 2
|Energy Released, J||16.7||37.6||16.7|
|Oxygen consumed, L||0.81||1.96||0.94|
|Carbon Dioxide produced, L||0.81||1.39||0.75|
In the experimental or clinical measurements of metabolic rate it is inaccurate to use measures of carbon dioxide production because there are large reservoirs of carbon dioxide, as carbonate and bicarbonate in the body, which buffer the concentration of carbon dioxide in expired breaths. Oxygen consumption, however, is not buffered in the tissues and can be readily determined using a face mask or hood and then measuring the steady state level of oxygen content in expired air.
The RQ observed for an individual on a 'mixed diet' is generally agreed to be about 0.85. An individual on a high carbohydrate diet can have a RQ of 1.00 or more and an individual relying heavily on metabolising fat reserves will have a RQ of 0.7 or reportedly less.
Thermic Response to Feeding
"Within 15 - 30 minutes after food enters the stomach the rate of thermogenesis rises to a peak at 30 - 60 minutes, and then gradually declines over the next 2 - 10 hours. This thermic response to food is associated with rises in the rate of oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, respiration rate, heat output, heart rate, heart stroke volume, cardiac output, myocardial oxygen consumption and systolic blood pressure. There is a fall in peripheral vascular resistance but no change in diastolic blood pressure." (Heymsfield et al in Chapter 26 of Nutrition and Metabolism in Patient Care, edited by Kinney et al, pub. by WB Saunders 1988.)
This chapter by Heymsfield et al. has some very interesting data on the response to feeding. Continuous enteral or parenteral feeding obliterates the peak and valley physiological response and replaces it with a steady raised physiological state - this is called a thermic response to fuel. The degree of elevation is determined by the rate of nutrient infusion, the composition of the nutrient formula infused and the patient's disease state.
Nutrient infusion rate - In nine normal individuals studied in the fasting state and then enterally with a maintenance formula the only statistically significant change was an increase in the heart rate by on average 5 beats per minute. Other investigations in eight normal individuals showed that doubling an enteral infusion of 40% fat, 15% protein and 45% carbohydrate produced easily discernable stepwise increases in metabolic rate, oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production and respiration rate. Other studies showed that these responses were approximately linearly related to the nutrient infusion rate.
Formula Composition - Heymsfield et al also produced dose response data where they used high carbohydrate ( 15% protein, 2% fat, 83% carbohydate ) and high fat ( 15% protein, 50% fat, 35 % carbohydrate) enteral formulae. In fact they were able to produce sets of equations that confidently related the increases in physiological response to the dosage of formulae. The model equations were all of the form
Physiological Response = Slope * Dose + Intercept
It was quite clear that high carbohydrate feeds elicited approximately double the physiological response for all parameters apart from the heart rates :
|-||Slope : HIGH FAT FEED||Slope : HIGH CHO FEED||Units|
|Oxygen Consumption||36.5||62.0||mL/kg FFM/min|
|CO2 Production||29.0||71.4||mL/kg FFM/min|
|Ventilation Rate||0.94||1.91||L/kg FFM/min|
|Free Energy Production||0.17||0.32||kcal/kg FFM/min|
The protein content of feeds did not appear to affect any of these physiological parameters when used at maintainance dosage levels.
Parenteral infusions into patients also showed dose response effects with metabolic rate and heart rate both increasing with increasing doses of solution.
Disease State - The spectrum of effects on metabolic rate can be related primarily to the spectrum possible changes in body composition in disease and trauma states. Loss of lean tissue mass, loss of total body fat, insulin resistance, catecholamine excess, wound size, presence of infection all co-interact to give a variety of metabolic profiles that will respond diffrently to nutritional support.
Diet Induced Thermogenesis - Some Recent Papers
Westerterp Plantenga et al (1999) have studied diet and diet induced thermogenesis in eight normal women using a metabolic chamber. They controlled the activity levels, meal sizes and meal intervals so that they were identical throughout the studies. The high protein plus high carbohydrate diet was associated with significantly greater diet induced thermogenesis and satiety than the high fat diet.
|29%||61%||10%||14.6 +/- 2.9%||More satient|
|9%||30%||61%||10.5 +/- 3.8%||Less satient|
Kopp Hoolihan et al (1999) have studied 10 women in pre-pregnancy and during pregnancy. They could find no predictive value between the pre-pregnancy measures of resting metabolic rate, diet induced thermogenesis, activity energy expenditure, energy intake and body fat mass and their handling of the additional energy intake associated with being pregnant. Each individual responded quite differently. However, they did observe a positive correlation between their resting metabolic rate and body fat mass, and a negative correlation between the cumulative change in their resting metabolic rate and the amount of fat deposited.
Mingrone et al (1999) have caried out test meal experiments in 18 stable Crohn's disease patients and matched them to the results from 12 healthy controls. As expected the fat mass was 27% less in the patients than in the controls. When they were given a test meal of 50.2 kJ/ kg body weight the patients had lipid oxidation rates that were 51% higher than the controls and diet induced thermogenesis was 74% more in the patients than in the controls.
|Fat Mass||13.8 +/- 5.63||19.0 +/- 3.49||kg||P<0.001|
|Lipid Oxidation||2.26 +/- 1.13||1.50 +/- 0.75||kJ/min||P<0.05|
|D.I.T.||9.89 +/- 1.93||5.67 +/- 0.91||% of energy intake||P<0.001|
These results confirm that Crohn's disease patients have increased demands for fat and that a diet with as much fat as they can tolerate would be of benefit in improving their body composition.
Moukaddem et al (1997) investigated diet induced thermogensis in anorexia patients during refeeding. They found that when they gave them two energetic loads there was an exactly similar increase in the diet induced thermogenesis. Under both loads diet induced thermogenesis accounted for a 16% of the provided energy load which could go some way to explaining why these patients have an adaptive resistance to overfeeding.
Three papers by Sellden and Lindahl provide some interesting data on the thermic effects of intravenous amino acids observed during surgery. In their 1999 paper they demonstrated that by infusing an amino acid mixture at 125 ml/hr intraoperatively in a group of 45 patients then their length of hospital stay was decreased by a median of 2.7 days; (95% confidence interval 1.3 - 4.0 days). They observed that the principal determinants of length of stay were the duration of the surgery, the use of the intra operative amino acid infusion and the core temperature of the patient at the end of surgery. They found that the amino acid treated group had significantly higher body core temperatures, 36.5 ° C +/- 0.1, than the patients that received acetated Ringer's solution intravenously, 35.7 ° C +/- 0.1; (p<0.01). Their other two papers established that there was no eveidence of different stress levels in the treated and untreated groups and that nitrogen excretion for four days postoperatively were similar to pre-operative levels in the treated group, but the in the untreated patients nitrogen excretion fell.
The Nutrition Screening initiative can be found at
It is well worth looking at if your work involves the dietary therapy of elderly people. In addition there are some convincing USA financial statistics as to what savings flow on from proactive nutrition screening at the GP and Hospital's Preadmission Clinic level. They use the word DETERMINE as an acronym for a nutrition checklist :
|D = Disease that affect nutrition|
|E = Eating too much or too little|
|T = Tooth loss and/or mouth pain|
|E = Economic hardship|
|R = Reduced social contact|
|M = Multiple prescribed medicines|
|I = Involuntary weight loss or gain|
|N = Needs assistance in self care|
|E = Elder years above age 80|
January 23rd -26th 2000 : 24th A.S.P.E.N. Clinical Congress , Opryland Hotel, Nashville, TN, USA.
March 8th - 10th, 2000 : Intensive Care: Life on the Edge NZ National ANZICS Year 2000 Conference Contact: Dr Ross Freebairn. Phone 06 8788109 Fax 09 8781365
April 2nd - 8th, 2000 : International Course on the Epidemiology of Diet, Nutrition and Cancer, Sestri Levante, Italy Contact: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150, Cours Albert-Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France Phone: +33 72 73 84 85 Fax: +33 72 75 85 75
July 23rd - 27th, 2000 : XIIIth International Congress of Dietetics, Edinburgh International Conference Centre, Scotland, United Kingdom. Contact Vicki Grant and Wendy Adesegun, c/o Meeting Makers, 50 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1QE, Scotland, United Kingdom. 44141 553 1930. Fax 44141 552 0511.
August 6th - 10th, 2000 : World Congress of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Boston, USA
Contact: Professeur Maherzi Ahmed, 20 bis Avenue Taieb Mehiri-La Marsa, Tunisie
August 24th - 1st September, 2000 : 17th International Congress of Nutrition, Vienna, Austria Contact: Dr R. Janssen, Int. Union of Nutritional Sciences, c/o The Graduate School, VLAG, Dept. of Human Nutrition, Wageningen Agricultural University, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands
September 10th - 13th, 2000 : 22nd ESPEN Congress : Third Millenium - Improved Nutrition for a Better Life . Madrid, Spain. Contact ESPEN 2000, c/o MCI Congress, Rue de Lyon 75, CH - 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Ph. +41-22-33-99-580 Fax +41-22-33-99-621.
email : firstname.lastname@example.org
Website : www.espen.org
September 17th - 20th, 2000 : Fourth International Conference on Dietary Assessment Methods, Sheraton El Conquistador Resort, Tucson, AZ. Contact Douglas Taren, Dietary Methods Conference, University of Arizona Prevention Center, PO Box 245163, Tucson, AZ 85719.
October 16th - 19th 2000 : The American Dietetic Association Annual Meeting and Exhibition, Colorado Convention Center-Denver, CO. Contact: The American Dietetic Association, 216 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60606-6995. Tel: 312-899-0040;
Exhibit information contact: Lisa Nicola, 800-877-1600, ext. 4755. Attendee information contact: Frances Jennings, 800-877- 1600, ext. 4866.
October 26th - 28th 2000 : ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC MEETING OF AuSPEN TOBE HELD IN LORNE, VICTORIA. CONTACT Dr Julie Bines,
Dept. of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, Royal Children's Hospital, MELBOURNE, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Ph +61-3-9345-5060. Fax +61-3-9345-6240
November 12th - 16th, 2000 : XII Latin American Congress of Nutrition, Buenos Aires. Contact Sociedad Latinoamericana de Nutrici, 12vo Congreso Lantinoamericano de Nutrición, Bernardo de Irigoyen 240 (1072), Buenos Aires, Argentina. (54 322) 334 15445.
Website : http://www.nutrimail.com/slan/SLAI.htm
21st - 24th January 2001 : 25th ASPEN Clinical Congress, Chicago, USA.
Contact: ASPEN, 8630 Genton Street, Suite 412, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Phone: (301) 587-6315 or (800) 727-4567
Fax: (301) 587-2365 or (800) 905-7781
The views and opinions expressed in this Newsletter are not necessarily the views and opinions of the Australian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Reports and articles on techniques, procedures and products are provided for the information of the Members of the Society and their inclusion does not imply any endorsements from the Australian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. No liability can or will be accepted by AuSPEN or its agents for the third party use of information in this Newsletter.
Dr Tom Hartley, Editor, 27/02/2000.
Editor : Dr Tom Hartley, 36, Pregnells Road, Sandfly, Tasmania 7150, Australia
Ph 03-6239-6475 (AH) 03-6222-8780 (BH) Fax 03-6231-3145
AuSPEN WWW Homepage : www.southcom.com.au/~hartley/home.htm